Connect with us

Published

on

  

 

The First and top-notch largest coalition of the Network of Women with disabilities NDW have expressed a deep sense of loss over the death of a foremost distinguished advocate for persons with disabilities in the country Prince  Sunday Adelabu on Thursday 29th July 2021.

 

Mrs Lois Auta the president and founder of the NWD expressed a deep sense of loss decrying the huge vacuum created by the demise of prince Sunday Adelabu.

 

Speaking on behalf of the NDW she said

  “The disability community in Nigeria lost a father figure “. Mr Adelabu has  been at the part of Disability struggling from the beginning as the  first President of Joint National Association of Persons with Disabilities, 

 

PRINCE PAUL ADELABU,  was until his death  BOT CHAIRMAN of JONAPWD

 

Prince Paul Adelabu was also a seasoned politician, a former Special Assistant to the immediate past Governor of Oyo State until his death, he was the Chairman, Board of Trustees, Joint National Association of Persons with Disabilities (JONAPWD).

 

Adelabu was a social worker and one of the pioneer  distinguished members of the Nigeria Association of Social Workers (NASoW), Oyo State chapter.

 

He had also served as Principal to Rehabilitation Center for people with disabilities in Moniya, Ibadan.

 

Mrs Lois Auta and the entire coalition of Network of Women with Disabilities expresses sincerest condolences with the family and the entire disability community and the Nation.

 

Signed

NDW Communication team

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

We Insist Ex-Speaker’s Removal Is Legal – Lagos Lawmakers

Published

on

Members of the Lagos State House of Assembly have reaffirmed that the removal of former Speaker Hon. Mudashiru Obasa was conducted lawfully, in line with constitutional provisions.

 

In a statement issued after their appearance at the Lagos Command of the Department of State Services (DSS) in Shangisha, the lawmakers emphasized that the decision adhered strictly to the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Powers and Privileges Act. They referenced Sections 92 and 96, which outline the procedures for electing and removing a Speaker, stressing that due process was followed.

 

“The Lagos State House of Assembly, as an independent arm of government, exercised its constitutional duty in the best interest of the people of Lagos. Any attempt to challenge this lawful action undermines the authority granted to us by the Nigerian Constitution,” the lawmakers stated.

 

They also commended the DSS for its professionalism and for ensuring a smooth and respectful engagement. All detained lawmakers have since been released.

 

Reiterating their commitment to legislative duties, the Assembly called on all stakeholders, including the executive and the public, to respect the sanctity of legislative processes and avoid undue interference.

Continue Reading

Business

Critics Slam Obasa’s Defiance As Legal Experts Validate His Removal

Published

on

The removal of Mudashiru Obasa as Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly has ignited a wave of reactions, with critics highlighting his controversial tenure and alleged misconduct.

 

Obasa, who addressed his supporters at the Speaker’s Lodge in Ikeja on Saturday, dismissed the process of his removal as unconstitutional, insisting that he remains the Speaker until “the right thing is done.” However, legal experts, political analysts, and concerned Lagosians have refuted his claims, asserting that his removal was both valid and inevitable.

 

Obasa argued that the lawmakers did not follow due process, citing his absence from the House on the day of his removal. However, legal experts have debunked this claims, emphasizing that the Nigerian Constitution does not require a Speaker to be present during their removal.

 

A legal practitioner stated, “According to Section 92(2)(c) of the 1999 Constitution, the Speaker can be removed by a resolution supported by the votes of not less that two-thirds majority of the members of the House. Obasa’s removal followed this process, and his argument is baseless.”

 

The expert further clarified that past removal of a former Speaker of the Lagos Assembly leaders, Rt. Hon. Jokotola Pelumi who was succeeded by Rt. Hon. Adeyemi Ikuforiji, also occurred in his absence, making Obasa’s claims of irregularity unfounded.

 

Regarding Obasa’s claim that the House erred as a Speaker cannot be impeached but only removed, the expert, after reviewing the motion for Obasa’s removal, disputed the former Speaker’s claim that he was impeached. According to him, Obasa was “removed,” not impeached, as clearly stated in the house resolution.

 

Furthermore, the expert emphasized that the law supports his removal, regardless of whether he was present or absent during the proceedings. That the House has the liberty to change its leadership as it so desires at anytime as long as the conditions stated by the constitution are adhered to, reminding everyone that the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is the grundnorm.

 

Political analysts and commentators have described Obasa’s removal as a turning point for the Lagos Assembly. Joseph Edgar, a prominent public affairs analyst, stated that Obasa’s defiant remarks undermine the integrity of the legislative arm of government.

 

“Obasa’s braggadocious response shows a lack of accountability. For someone with such serious allegations against him, his focus should be on clearing his name, not stirring unnecessary controversy,” Edgar said.

 

Political observers have highlighted the irony of Obasa’s situation. Many recall his role in the removal of previous leaders, describing his current predicament as “karma.”

 

Obasa’s removal is the inevitable consequence of his actions. His stance against local government autonomy and his insubordination towards leadership in the state made his position untenable.

 

Banire also pointed out that Obasa’s removal marks the end of his political influence, as his power was tied to his position as Speaker. “In politics, people worship power and money. Once he lost the office, his influence crumbled,” he added.

 

As the dust settles, the focus has shifted to holding Obasa accountable for the allegations against him. Legal experts and concerned citizens have called for thorough investigations into his tenure to restore public trust in the Lagos Assembly.

 

While Obasa ‘strongly believes’ he remains Speaker and hints at a possible legal battle, analysts believe his removal signals a need for the APC-led government to prioritize competence and accountability in electing legislative representatives to prevent similar controversies in the future.

 

For now, Lagosians await Obasa’s next move, but his valid removal is a reminder that power is transcient.

Continue Reading

Trending News